My goal as a teacher is to create an intellectually curious environment that encourages the application of critical thought to social and philosophical problems. I enjoy the challenge of designing interactive activities that foster student interest while deepening student understanding.



Michigan State University

Lyman Briggs College

LB133 – Introduction to History and Philosophy and Sociology of Science

| Syllabus Fall 2019 |

The purpose of this class is twofold: First, this class will introduce you to fundamental concepts and methods in HPS, and second, it will help build writing confidence and skill. With regards to HPS we will explore questions like: What is science, and who practices it? What are science’s methodologies? How does the methodology of science create scientific controversies? Can more scientific information defuse a controversy? What role do aspects of controversies that are often seen as outside of science (race, gender, values, money) play in science and resulting controversies? Students will be encouraged to form their own opinions on how controversies should be handled and support their opinions with evidence and argumentation. With regards to writing, students will be encouraged to develop their own healthy writing practices through repeated writing practice. Students will learn to diagram arguments, address audiences, offer peer comments, and revise their work.

LB321 – Science and the Public

| Syllabus Spring 2019 |

Students in this class will explore the role of values within the interpretation, methodology, and use of scientific findings, the ways various stakeholders that shape public understandings of science, and the feedback loop between the scientific community and broad publics. We will become immersed in a range of topics and texts that have emerged from various disciplines exploring how stakeholders lay claim to, interpret, and present “science”, and how audiences respond to and shape scientific findings.

Department of Philosophy

PHL130 – Logic and Reasoning

| Syllabus Fall 2018 |

This course focuses on the identification, evaluation, and construction of arguments. Students will learn how to assess arguments and how to identify common problems in reasoning. The training you receive in this course should help you to become a more sensitive critic of a variety of sources that you encounter on a daily basis and should provide you with tools to think more carefully and critically


Colby College

STS197 – Biology and Society, January (“Jan-Plan”) 2017

| Syllabus | Course Evaluations |

From environmental crises to medical advancements and global food shortages, biology and the life sciences are implicated in some of the most pressing social issues of our times. This class uses the board game Pandemic Legacy to introduce and discuss these issues. We investigate how developments in biology have shaped and are shaped by society. In the first unit, we investigate the institutions and technologies that influence the modern life sciences, including the role of universities, governments, and public-private partnerships in the development of biology, as well as the selection of certain species or groups of people as “model organisms.” In the second unit, we explore areas of biology that have raised controversies about regulation and access, such as the GMO and vaccine controversies, and the role of race and social position in relation to access to medicine and media coverage of disaster. In the final unit, we examine how biological facts are used to answer the question of what it means to be human. The course aims to help students in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities develop the analytical skills needed to confront complex social issues involving the life sciences.

STS297 – Views of a Changing Planet: History and Philosophy of the Environment Through Film and Fiction, January (“Jan-Plan”) 2015

| Syllabus | Course Evaluations | Course Website |

Examples of Student Work:
Students in this class were asked to use the course material to construct their own narratives describing possible environmental futures. As an additional laboratory component of the course, students learned digital audio editing to turn their written narratives into podcast-ready audio performances.

Example of a student audio performance:

Example student narrative: “Boiling Point” by Sarah Leathe

Course Description:
How can we understand changes in our environment? How can we powerfully speak about those changes? Why do some narratives speak to us more than others? This class draws on history and philosophy as a background to answer these questions and to analyze how the future of our planet has been conceptualized in film and fiction. By engaging with narratives (told through various media including: film, speculative fiction, audio, etc.), this course allows students to think critically about the changing world and possible environmental futures. This discussion will be deepened by an investigation of the relationship between science, technology, and society, which both limit and promote certain directions of environmental change. We will explore how topics such as uncertainty, distributive justice, authority, and personal/national identity shape both our understanding of the environment and our narratives about it. By the end of the course, students will create their own narratives and will have a chance to publicly share that narrative using a digital medium of their choice.

University of Toronto

HPS211 – Scientific Revolutions II, University of Toronto, Summer 2014

| Course Evaluations |

This course examines scientific episodes from (roughly) 1800 to (roughly) the present from a broadly philosophical perspective. We review a number of case studies focusing on biology, geology, physics, technology, and climate science. We use this history to discuss theories of scientific change, as well as the metaphysics and epistemology of science. The class is designed to be accessible to scientists and non-scientists, and as such, the class will tend to focus on the broader implications of scientific practice, rather than the narrow interests of a particular discipline.

Ohio University

Phil120 – Introduction to Logic, 2007-2009 (six terms)

| Course Evaluations |

Want to know how to defeat your enemies with arguments? This course teaches the logical reasoning that forms the basis of good argumentation. We examine common fallacies to be avoided in reasoning, and introduce certain techniques for judging the validity of arguments. The course will employ syllogistic or Aristotelian logic, Venn diagrams, and truth tables. We also cover how to translate arguments into logical sentences and evaluate them using formal systems of propositional logic.

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑